# Corrections Welcome. Sales Pitches Are Not Evidence.

> Contact Peachy Peptides — Recovery & Tissue Repair Research Peptides — Contact the Peachy Peptides editorial desk about source corrections or clarity in the Recovery & Tissue Repair research peptides digest.

**CONTACT / EDITORIAL DESK**

The desk accepts specific source corrections, citation problems, and clarity notes concerning the published digest.

## Contact the editorial desk

Peachy Peptides welcomes concise correspondence about factual accuracy, citation mapping, study characterization, accessibility, or broken reference links. Messages can be directed to **editorial@peachypeptides.com**. A useful correction identifies the page, quotes the disputed sentence, and names the listed source or passage that supports the change.

The mailbox is not a clinical service. It cannot answer personal health questions, interpret symptoms, recommend a product, assess an individual protocol, or provide sourcing information. Vendor submissions, purchase requests, affiliate proposals, and promotional testimonials fall outside the editorial scope.

## What happens to a correction

A substantive note is checked against the composed source record. If the site overstates a finding, confuses a study model, detaches a number from its citation, or treats a constituent result as evidence for GLOW, the copy can be revised. Preference is given to primary studies and careful peer-reviewed syntheses already represented in the reference ledger.

Anecdotes may identify questions worth researching, but they do not replace controlled evidence and are not published as proof. Commercial relationships do not determine coverage. The useful standard is prosaic: a correction must make the description more accurate, more traceable, or clearer about uncertainty.

## Privacy and expectations

Correspondence should omit private medical details. Messages may be retained for editorial follow-up, but personal case histories are neither needed nor evaluated. Not every message receives a response, and silence does not imply agreement or clinical judgment.

For questions already covered by the corpus, the [FAQ](/faq), [comparison](/compare), and [references](/references) pages are the fastest route. They state the site’s position plainly: limited topical evidence is not universal proof, animal repair data is not human efficacy, and an untested blend remains untested.

---

Peachy Peptides is an independent audit of skin-and-repair literature—neither a treatment desk nor a place where a plausible pathway gets promoted to medical advice.